Frontiers in natural and un-natural glasses: An interdisciplinary dialogue and review
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How Natural is Argument in Natural Dialogue?
Exposed disagreement is extremely rare in natural dialogue. Although informal argumentation features frequently in natural dialogue, the ways in which individuals make and evidence claims and position their opinions in relation to those of others is often achieved through more subtle and oblique methods. This makes natural dialogue distinct from more formal or institutionalised contexts. With i...
متن کاملNatural Language and Dialogue Interfaces
The design and development of natural interactive systems requires that the specific aspects of natural communication are taken into account. Besides the capability to understand and generate linguistic expressions, natural language use includes cooperation and planning of complex actions on the basis of observations of the communicative context, i.e., communicative competence. This Chapter dis...
متن کاملNatural radioactivity of some Egyptian materials used in glasses manufacturing and glass ceramics
Background: The new glasses from harmful environmental waste such as cement dust; limestone phosphate, sand and borax (Genkare) were manufactured. Investigation of the radioactivity present in these materials (Phosphate rock, cement dust, limestone, sand and borax) enables one to assess any possible radiological hazard to humankind by such materials. Materials and Methods: Fifteen samples were ...
متن کاملRestructuring an Interdisciplinary Dialogue
Almost exactly fifty years before the Notre Dame conference, the world’s largest centenary commemoration of Darwin’s legacy was held at nearby University of Chicago. This event, organized by a committee spearheaded by University of Chicago anthropologist Sol Tax, drew nearly 2,500 registrants. In attendance were the primary leaders of evolutionary biology, paleontology, anthropology, and geneti...
متن کاملDirectionality and (un)natural Classes in Syncretism
Syncretism, where a single form corresponds to multiple morphosyntactic functions, is pervasive in languages with inflectional morphology. Its interpretation highlights the contrast between different views of the status of morphology. For some, morphology lacks independent structure, and syncretism reflects the internal structure of morphosyntactic features. For others, morphological structure ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2590-1591
DOI: 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.100035